An etalon is a optical devise inserted into a laser cavity in order to extend the coherence length. It works by selecting a single frequency of the cavity and only allowing it to propegate. The other modes present are extiguished.
- Etalon redirects here. Etalon is also the French word for stallion.
In optics, a Fabry-Pérot interferometer or etalon is typically made of a transparent plate with two reflecting surfaces, or two parallel highly-reflecting mirrors. (Technically the former is an etalon and the latter is an interferometer, but the terminology is often used inconsistently.) Its transmission spectrum as a function of wavelength exhibits peaks of large transmission corresponding to resonances of the etalon. It is named after Charles Fabry and Alfred Pérot. 'Etalon' is from the French étalon, meaning 'measuring gauge' or 'standard' .
Etalons are widely used in telecommunications, lasers and spectroscopy for controlling and measuring the wavelength of light. Recent advances in fabrication technique allow the creation of very precise tunable Fabry-Pérot interferometers. Fabry-Pérot interferometers also form the most common type of optical cavity used in laser construction.
Telecommunications networks employing wavelength division multiplexing have add-drop multiplexers with banks of miniature tuned fused silica or diamond etalons. These are small iridescent cubes about 2 mm on a side, mounted in small high-precision racks. The materials are chosen to maintain stable mirror-to-mirror distances, and to keep stable frequencies even when the temperature varies. Diamond is preferred because it has greater heat conduction and still has a low coefficient of expansion. In 2005, some telecommunications equipment companies began using solid etalons that are themselves optical fibers. This eliminates most mounting, alignment and cooling difficulties.
The varying transmission function of an etalon is caused by interference between the multiple reflections of light between the two reflecting surfaces. Constructive interference occurs if the transmitted beams are in phase, and this corresponds to a high-transmission peak of the etalon. If the transmitted beams are out-of-phase, destructive interference occurs and this corresponds to a transmission minimum. Whether the multiply-reflected beams are in-phase or not, depends on the wavelength (λ) of the light, the angle the light travels through the etalon (θ), the thickness of the etalon (l) and the refractive index of the material between the reflecting surfaces (n).
The phase difference between each succeeding reflection is given by δ:
If both surfaces have a reflection coefficient R, the transmission function of the etalon is given by:
Maximum transmission (Te = 1) occurs when the optical path-length difference (2nl cos θ) between each transmitted beam is an integer multiple of the wavelength. In the absence of absorption, the reflectivity of the etalon Re is the complement of the transmission, such that Te + Re = 1. The maximum reflectivity is given by:
and this occurs when the path-length difference is equal to half an odd multiple of the wavelength.
The wavelength separation between adjacent transmission peaks is called the free spectral range (FSR) of the etalon, Δλ, and is given by:
where λ0 is the central wavelength of the nearest transmission peak. The FSR is related to the full-width half-maximum, δλ, of any one transmission band by a quantity known as the finesse:
where is the coefficient of finesse.
This is commonly approximated (for R > 0.5) by
Etalons with high finesse show sharper transmission peaks with lower minimum transmission coefficients.
A Fabry-Pérot interferometer differs from a Fabry-Pérot etalon in the fact that the distance l between the plates can be tuned in order to change the wavelengths at which transmission peaks occur. Due to the angle dependence of the transmission, the peaks can also be shifted by rotating the etalon with respect to the beam.
Two beams are shown in the diagram at the right, one of which ( ) is transmitted through the etalon, and the other of which ( ) is reflected twice before being transmitted. At each reflection, the amplitude is reduced by and the phase is shifted by , while at each transmission through an interface the amplitude is reduced by . Assuming no absorption, we have by conservation of energy . Define n as the index of refraction inside the etalon, and as the index of refraction outside the etalon. Using phasors to represent the amplitude of the radiation, let's suppose that the amplitude at point is unity. The amplitude at point will then be
where is the wave number inside the etalon. At point the amplitude will be
The total amplitude of both beams will be the sum of the amplitudes of the two beams measured along a line perpendicular to the direction of the beam. We therefore add the amplitude at point b to an amplitude equal in magnitude to the amplitude at point c, but which has been retarded in phase by an amount where is the wave number outside of the etalon. Thus:
where is seen to be:
Neglecting the phase change due to the two reflections, we have for the phase difference between the two beams
The relationship between and is given by Snell's law:
So that the phase difference may be written
To within a constant multiplicative phase factor, the amplitude of the m-th transmitted beam can be written as
The total transmitted beam is the sum of all individual beams
The series is a geometric series whose sum can be expressed analytically. The amplitude can be rewritten as
The intensity of the beam will be just and, since the incident beam was assumed to have an intensity of unity, this will also give the transmission function:
Another expression for the transmission function
Another useful expression for the transmission function may be derived as follows: The sum representation of the amplitude may be used directly to express the transmission function:
Defining , rearranging terms, and using the geometric series formula on R yields
where is the Lorentz distribution:
and . The order of integration and summation may be interchanged which yields a sum over the exponential term alone. This sum is seen to be a Dirac comb and so the transmission function is seen to be the convolution of a Lorentzian function and a Dirac comb: